Carbon offsets (also referred to as carbon credits) can be generated by any type of project that reduces or eliminates greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions beyond a business-as-usual scenario. Projects generating carbon credits are typically grouped into two categories: (i) avoidance / reduction projects, such as forest conservation, renewable energy or methane capture and (ii) removal / sequestration projects, such as reforestation/afforestation, wetland restoration or direct air capture technology. An individual, government, organization or company can purchase carbon credits to offset their carbon emissions.
The vintage year of the offset refers to the year the emission reduction occurred. Some projects will issue offsets every year, while some will issue offsets in multi-year increments. An offset can be resold but once it has been permanently sold to an end user who wants to claim the offset’s impact, it can no longer be resold. To ensure that it is not, an offset must be listed as retired on a registry that keeps track of the issuance and retirement of offsets.
Carbon offsets can either be traded on the voluntary markets, where buyers and sellers trade on their own volition, or as part of a compliance market, where government regulations require emitters to either reduce their emissions, use allocated carbon allowances or purchase compliance credits or carbon offsets.
All offset projects must create a measurable, trackable, permanent and independently verified reduction in GHG emissions that would not have occurred in the absence of the revenue generated from the offset. To ensure that emissions reductions are real and “additional,” meaning they would not have been achieved without carbon finance, the vast majority of carbon offset projects use third-party verified standards to approve their carbon credits.
For example, some offsets traded on compliance markets are created based on crediting mechanisms governed by international climate treaties and administered by international institutions, such as Clean Development Mechanism or Joint Implementation projects. On the voluntary markets, the vast majority of projects follow rules and procedures set out by independent third-party organizations, such as the Gold Standard and the Verified Carbon Standard, which together audit and accredit about 80% of the offsets in the voluntary market.
Carbon offsets are often used by corporations to meet the goals of their climate policies. According to the NewClimate Institute, more than 1,500 companies worldwide have announced plans to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 or earlier and align themselves with the Paris Agreement. In order to achieve these goals, some high emitting industries, such as oil, mining, airlines and steel, will need to rely on carbon offsets since a large share of their emissions cannot be abated with current technologies. Carbon offsets are anticipated to be instrumental in achieving decarbonization when low-carbon alternatives are not available, too expensive or hard to scale.
Ecosystem Marketplace estimates that the amount of carbon credits traded in voluntary markets worldwide in 2019 was 104 Mt CO2e for a total market value of US$320 million. Forestry and land use projects represented the majority of transactions (50% by value), followed by renewable energy projects (19%). A growing number of corporations that are looking to use “nature-based solutions” to offset their GHG emissions have created a demand for forest carbon credits. Forest carbon credit projects include improved forest management (IFM), avoided conversion (AC) of forestland to a non-forest use and afforestation/reforestation (AR).
Carbon Streaming intends to participate in the voluntary and compliance carbon markets by creating streaming arrangements with individuals, companies and governments to stream carbon credits from their assets or properties. We will seek carbon credits that have high “environmental integrity” and are accredited by third-parties, such as the Verified Carbon Standard. Carbon Streaming will also require reliable and transparent monitoring, reporting and verification of its carbon credit projects. In addition, we intend to prioritize those projects that offer other environmental co-benefits (e.g. pollution mitigation, biodiversity or water conservation) and benefit local communities.
We believe that the demand for carbon offsets will rise in the future as more companies adopt climate action plans, which are increasingly being required by shareholders, regulators and customers. In addition, the carbon compliance market for airlines (CORSIA) should also increase demand for carbon offsets given that CORSIA, though a compliance market will use a mix of compliance and voluntary carbon credits. Also, the postponed 26th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP26) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) will take place in November 2021, where they will discuss Article 6 of the Paris Agreement which includes a pledge to establish an international carbon market. One of the topics to be discussed at COP26 is accounting protocols for carbon credits to avoid emissions being double counted and standards for environmental assessment. Once these have been established, we believe there may be greater demand for carbon offsets by countries to meet their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement.